A common piece of advice among writers is to "start a story in the middle." The idea is that tales often don't get interesting until a certain amount of tension builds, or problems unfold. By starting a story in the middle, the characters have their motivations firmly in place, and the reader gets to find out not only what happens next, but what has already happened. This is fresh on my mind after just watching the final performance of Seattle Opera's "La Traviata," Verdi's famous tragedy.* I'd never seen it before, nor was I familiar with the story, although in many ways it's a classic tale.
I wish I had seen it earlier so I could have recommended it to more people!!! |
The opera opens right where my summary began: at a party, where the Parisian elite are teasing this bookworm by pushing him towards his celebrity crush. We know nothing of the courtesan's past except that she must be good at what she does to be so popular. As the opera goes on, we learn more of her lover's past than of hers. But the story doesn't need anything more: the themes of the tragedy (and the gorgeous music) speak for themselves.
Now a novel doesn't have the benefit of music or actors to fill out the blanks. The author must find ways to do this on their own. But more than that, the author has to figure out something more subtle: just where the heck is the "middle," anyway?
Some stories seem like they're starting at the beginning, & it's not until later the reader realizes how they are really in the middle of something--something big. While not an expert on the genre, it seems to me this is how pretty much every mystery goes. Consider the Sherlock Holmes mysteries; sure, it's the beginning of the adventure for the famous detective, but the mystery itself may have been gathering momentum for years.
"Once upon a time" could mean a lot of things, depending on the timeline in question. |
While I'm certain there are plenty of authors, professors, editors, & other people far more experienced & successful than I who give a concise definition of what it means to "start a story in the middle," I'm starting to think that for me it really means knowing the story myself. As the author, I need to know what happened to set up the events at the opening of my tale. After all, a good novel is rarely one story: it's usually several interwoven. "Pride & Prejudice" may seem to start at the beginning - when Elizabeth first meets Mr. Darcy - but later we learn the story of Mr. Darcy's pride & reserve, & the scandal that threatened his family & comes to threaten hers.
Maybe I'm getting too philosophical here, but thinking about where a story starts seems a lot of like trying to figure out when a day begins. Midnight? When the sun breaches or the horizon? Or pulls free of it? When your alarm goes off? When your coffee kicks in? Maybe it's not so much about starting the story in the middle, as it is about the writer creating a sense of real time continuum. After all, everyone wants to believe their own next adventure could start any moment!
*It's so famous, that even if you're not an opera fan you're probably familiar with at least one tune.
**Of course it has to be Paris, even though the opera is in Italian.