Just in case you've been wondering where I'm at in the grand scheme of writing things, I've actually been doing a lot. My new daily routine allows for at least a solid hour of writing every morning, while I enjoy my breakfast. The situation is ideal for me: wake up, make tasty food, eat part while checking email and reading my daily webcomics, and then finish up my tea while working on stories. I honestly love my mornings. How many people can say that?
|
My idea of heaven is to spend a week at a gourmet bed & breakfast with a view of the ocean, and be able to spend my days writing and walking, well-fed in body and soul |
As for WHAT I'm writing...well...that's a different matter.
Once upon a time, I wrote a gas lamp fantasy manuscript about two demons trying to be human, two women trying to be themselves, a curse, and a conspiracy to bring hell on earth. I *loved* writing this story. And it was ridiculously long. Like, 150k words long. No way any editor in their right mind would accept a manuscript like that from an unproven author.
So I did the intelligent thing and divided it into two books. Now I had two manuscripts, each of the perfect length, and honestly I thought they were both pretty good. I got some good feedback from beta readers, trimmed some parts, lengthened others, and firmed up the dialogue a bit. And last year I submitted queries to several different agents.
I got a few nibbles, but no bites--which isn't a big surprise. Had logic prevailed, I would have shelved the manuscript for the time being and gone on to work on other projects (how many have I got in the works now? Seven? Eight?). But I have this problem: I think this story is the best work I have ever done. I think the plot, the characters, the world, the language, all of it is seriously solid. I read other published novels that are in the same genre and I think, "But my story is BETTER than this one! How'd this get published, and not mine!?"*
I'm biased, of course. Not only because it's my work, but because I know it so well I can't be objective anymore. It's too familiar, so I can't tell where there are holes in the plot, or if important scenes are understated or over-dramatic. Of course I strive to be thoughtful and intelligent in my approach, but that's not a perfect guide. In fact, there are times I suspect I'm downright wrong. Such as my latest idea.
"Clearly," I thought, "the problem is that the story needs to be a TRILOGY!!!"
Just writing this makes me want to smack myself on the forehead.
|
If you ever catch my trying to make this into 4 books, please, please stop me. |
So yeah. I've spent the last couple months dividing my two novels into three, re-arranging some of the scenes, adding back in some deleted material, and adding new bits to try and create compelling individual story arcs. Believe me, I am in no way entirely convinced this is a smart move. But there was no way to know until I'd done it, and once I started, I'm committed.
I just finished the first draft of book one. Now I get to tackle book two. That's going to involve a lot of scene re-arranging. *sigh* My plan is to finish a first draft of the trilogy, and then ignore it for a few months while I work on something else. Then hopefully come back to it with semi-fresh eyes. And maybe shell out the bucks for a professional editor, because at this point, all my dear, dear friends who volunteer as beta-readers have already gone through at least one version of this thing.
This is why I write first thing in the morning: creativity flows best before I actually let myself think.
*Not to misconstrue my ego, it should be noted that this is not my reaction to most novels. Most novels I read with mingled joy, envy, and despair, thinking: "This is so freaking awesome! I wish I could write like this! But I don't think I'll ever be able to write like this! Therefore I will go eat more chocolate, and read the next chapter, instead of doing the dishes!"